View source for Stiripentol in severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy: a randomised placebo-controlled syndrome-dedicated trial. STICLO study group

''Chiron C, Marchand MC, Tran A, Rey E, d’Athis P, Vincent J, Dulac O, and Pons G (2000) Stiripentol in severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy: a randomised placebo-controlled syndrome-dedicated trial. sticlo study group. Lancet 356:9242 1638–42.''

'''[http://ac.els-cdn.com.ezp.welch.jhmi.edu/S0140673600031573/1-s2.0-S0140673600031573-main.pdf?_tid=e142d65a-682c-11e7-9748-00000aacb360&acdnat=1499992942_5ab0cf21e907693a1571c331a194945d Link to Article]'''

'''Abstract:''' <u>BACKGROUND:</u> Stiripentol is an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 that showed antiepileptic efficacy in severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy (SMEI) in association with clobazam and valproate in an open study. To confirm these results, 41 children with SMEI were included in a randomised, placebo-controlled, add-on trial. <u>METHODS:</u> After a baseline period of 1 month, placebo (n=20) or stiripentol (n=21) was added to valproate and clobazam during a double-blind period of 2 months. Patients then received stiripentol in an open fashion. Responders were defined as having more than 50% reduction in the frequency of clonic (or tonic-clonic) seizures during the second month of the double-blind period compared with baseline. <u>FINDINGS:</u> 15 (71%) patients were responders on stiripentol (including nine free of clonic or tonic-clonic seizures), whereas there was only one (5%) on placebo (none were seizure free; stiripentol 95% CI 52.1-90.7 vs placebo 0-14.6). The 95% CI of the difference was 42.2-85.7. Percentage of change from baseline was higher on stiripentol (-69%) than on placebo (+7%), p<0.0001. 21 patients on stiripentol had moderate side-effects (drowsiness, loss of appetite) compared with eight on placebo, but side-effects disappeared when the dose of comedication was decreased in 12 of the 21 cases. <u>INTERPRETATION:</u> This controlled trial shows the antiepileptic efficacy, of add-on stiripentol in children with SMEI. The results also provide good reason to focus studies on a specific epilepsy syndrome-a small sample of patients is sufficient to show the efficacy that might have been missed in a heterogeneous population.

=Comments and Context=