Diagnostic accuracy of audio-based seizure detection in patients with severe epilepsy and an intellectual disability

From SUDEP Wiki
Revision as of 13:29, 28 June 2018 by Ycarmen1 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "''Arends JB, van Dorp J, van Hoek D, et al. (2016) Diagnostic accuracy of audio-based seizure detection in patients with severe epilepsy and an intellectual disability. Epilep...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Arends JB, van Dorp J, van Hoek D, et al. (2016) Diagnostic accuracy of audio-based seizure detection in patients with severe epilepsy and an intellectual disability. Epilepsy Behav. 2016 Sep;62:180-5.

Link to Article

Abstract: We evaluated the performance of audio-based detection of major seizures (tonic-clonic and long generalized tonic) in adult patients with intellectual disability living in an institute for residential care. METHODS: First, we checked in a random sample (n=17, 102 major seizures) how many patients have recognizable sounds during these seizures. In the second part of this trial, we followed 10 patients (who had major seizures with recognizable sounds) during four weeks with an acoustic monitoring system developed by CLB ('CLB-monitor') and video camera. In week 1, we adapted the sound detection threshold until, per night, a maximum of 20 sounds was found. During weeks 2-4, we selected the epilepsy-related sounds and performed independent video verification and labeling ('snoring', 'laryngeal contraction') of the seizures. The video images were also fully screened for false negatives. In the third part, algorithms in the CLB-monitor detected one specific sound (sleep-related snoring) to illustrate the value of automatic sound recognition. RESULTS: Part 1: recognizable sounds (louder than whispering) occurred in 23 (51%) of the 45 major seizures, 20 seizures (45%) were below this threshold, and 2 (4%) were without any sound. Part 2: in the follow-up group (n=10, 112 major seizures; mean: 11.2, range: 1-30), we found a mean sensitivity of 0.81 (range: 0.33-1.00) and a mean positive predictive value of 0.40 (range: 0.06-1.00). All false positive alarms (mean value: 1.29 per night) were due to minor seizures. We missed 4 seizures (3%) because of lack of sound and 10 (9%) because of sounds below the system threshold. Part 3: the machine-learning algorithms in the CLB-monitor resulted in an overall accuracy for 'snoring' of 98.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Audio detection of major seizures is possible in half of the patients. Lower sound detection thresholds may increase the proportion of suitable candidates. Human selection of seizure-related sounds has a high sensitivity and moderate positive predictive value because of minor seizures which do not need intervention. Algorithms in the CLB-monitor detect seizure-related sounds and may be used alone or in multimodal systems.

Keywords: Epilepsy, Seizure detection, Audio monitoring, Diagnostic study

Context

=Comments