Difference between revisions of "The SUDEP Risk Inventory: Association with postictal generalized EEG suppression"

From SUDEP Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "''Moseley BD and DeGiorgio CM (2015) The SUDEP Risk Inventory: Association with postictal generalized EEG suppression. Epilepsy Res. 117:82-4.'' '''[https://ac.els-cdn.com/S0...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
''Moseley BD and DeGiorgio CM (2015) The SUDEP Risk Inventory: Association with postictal generalized EEG suppression. Epilepsy Res. 117:82-4.''
+
{{Reference
  
'''[https://ac.els-cdn.com/S0920121115300486/1-s2.0-S0920121115300486-main.pdf?_tid=9eb640f4-ca7b-419a-a0c2-e9f97555e6f8&acdnat=1530209412_0e9931bd4b1c1275fd1e229b6a0b1f31 Link to Article]'''
+
|reference=
  
'''Abstract:''' To help identify patients at greatest risk for sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP), screening inventories like the SUDEP-7 Inventory can be useful. In this study, we examined the strength of association between this inventory's risk factors and postictal generalized EEG suppression (PGES), a biomarker of SUDEP risk. We reanalyzed data from an epilepsy monitoring unit study of 37 children. We performed a 2 by 2 contingency table analysis to determine the association between "yes" responses on the inventory questions and PGES following >=1 seizure. Having a history of >3 generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) in the past year had the strongest association with PGES (Pearson chi-square p<0.001, Cramer's V=0.75). Having >=1 GTCS in the past year was also strongly associated with PGES (Pearson chi-square p<0.001, Cramer's V=0.636). Histories of >50 seizures of any type/month (Pearson chi-square p=0.14, Cramer's V=0.241) and intellectual disability (Pearson chi-square p=0.04, Cramer's V=0.337) were not as robustly associated with PGES. Current use of >=3 AEDs had the weakest association with PGES (Pearson chi-square p=0.66, Cramer's V=0.072). Given that all study patients had >=1 seizure per year and epilepsy durations <30 years, the strength of association with these questions and PGES could not be analyzed.
+
Moseley BD and DeGiorgio CM (2015) The SUDEP Risk Inventory: Association with postictal generalized EEG suppression. Epilepsy Res. 117:82-4.
  
'''Keywords:''' Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy, SUDEP, Risk Factor, Inventory, PGES, Epilepsy
+
|url=
  
==Context==
+
https://ac.els-cdn.com/S0920121115300486/1-s2.0-S0920121115300486-main.pdf?_tid=9eb640f4-ca7b-419a-a0c2-e9f97555e6f8&acdnat=1530209412_0e9931bd4b1c1275fd1e229b6a0b1f31
  
==Comments==
+
|abstract=
 +
 
 +
To help identify patients at greatest risk for sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP), screening inventories like the SUDEP-7 Inventory can be useful. In this study, we examined the strength of association between this inventory's risk factors and postictal generalized EEG suppression (PGES), a biomarker of SUDEP risk. We reanalyzed data from an epilepsy monitoring unit study of 37 children. We performed a 2 by 2 contingency table analysis to determine the association between "yes" responses on the inventory questions and PGES following >=1 seizure. Having a history of >3 generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) in the past year had the strongest association with PGES (Pearson chi-square p<0.001, Cramer's V=0.75). Having >=1 GTCS in the past year was also strongly associated with PGES (Pearson chi-square p<0.001, Cramer's V=0.636). Histories of >50 seizures of any type/month (Pearson chi-square p=0.14, Cramer's V=0.241) and intellectual disability (Pearson chi-square p=0.04, Cramer's V=0.337) were not as robustly associated with PGES. Current use of >=3 AEDs had the weakest association with PGES (Pearson chi-square p=0.66, Cramer's V=0.072). Given that all study patients had >=1 seizure per year and epilepsy durations <30 years, the strength of association with these questions and PGES could not be analyzed.
 +
 
 +
|keywords=
 +
 
 +
Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy, SUDEP, Risk Factor, Inventory, PGES, Epilepsy
 +
 
 +
|context=
 +
 
 +
 
 +
|comments=
 +
 
 +
 
 +
}}

Latest revision as of 14:10, 17 June 2019


Moseley BD and DeGiorgio CM (2015) The SUDEP Risk Inventory: Association with postictal generalized EEG suppression. Epilepsy Res. 117:82-4.

Link to Article

Abstract: To help identify patients at greatest risk for sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP), screening inventories like the SUDEP-7 Inventory can be useful. In this study, we examined the strength of association between this inventory's risk factors and postictal generalized EEG suppression (PGES), a biomarker of SUDEP risk. We reanalyzed data from an epilepsy monitoring unit study of 37 children. We performed a 2 by 2 contingency table analysis to determine the association between "yes" responses on the inventory questions and PGES following >=1 seizure. Having a history of >3 generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) in the past year had the strongest association with PGES (Pearson chi-square p<0.001, Cramer's V=0.75). Having >=1 GTCS in the past year was also strongly associated with PGES (Pearson chi-square p<0.001, Cramer's V=0.636). Histories of >50 seizures of any type/month (Pearson chi-square p=0.14, Cramer's V=0.241) and intellectual disability (Pearson chi-square p=0.04, Cramer's V=0.337) were not as robustly associated with PGES. Current use of >=3 AEDs had the weakest association with PGES (Pearson chi-square p=0.66, Cramer's V=0.072). Given that all study patients had >=1 seizure per year and epilepsy durations <30 years, the strength of association with these questions and PGES could not be analyzed.

Keywords: Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy, SUDEP, Risk Factor, Inventory, PGES, Epilepsy

Context

Comments

Network Graph

Retrieving data for the network graph...